I have spent the past 11 years around agencies. Building one, running software for one, and working closely with dozens of automation agencies and GoHighLevel operators who are genuinely good at what they do.
And in almost every single conversation, the same blind spot shows up. Not because these people are lazy or careless. The opposite. They are usually the sharpest operators in their market. It is just that nobody has pointed at this particular gap yet, so it can sit there quietly creating missed opportunities.
So let me point at it.

Your AI answers on the website. And that’s it.
Here is what most agencies call an “AI presence” right now.
A chat widget on the client’s site. It greets people, answers a few questions, maybe books a call. It looks modern. The client is happy. Job done.
Then a customer calls at lunchtime and gets voicemail. Sends a WhatsApp that evening and gets nothing. Replies to an SMS at 9pm and hears silence.
You have AI standing at one door. The other four are wide open with nobody there.
And this is not a small problem, because customers stopped using one channel a long time ago. McKinsey’s B2B Pulse research, which surveyed more than 3,800 decision makers across 13 countries, found that buyers use an average of ten different channels across their buying journey. Back in 2016 that number was five. It has doubled. Forty-two percent of respondents in the research said they used more than eleven touchpoints.
Ten channels. And your AI might cover only one of them.

The five point test
Before we go further, run this on your own setup. Honest yes or no on each:
- Website chat. Does it actively engage visitors, or just sit there waiting to be clicked?
- Voice inbound. Does something intelligent answer when a lead actually calls?
- Voice outbound. Does it call leads back on its own, without someone pressing a button?
- SMS. Does it hold a real back and forth, or just fire one scheduled text?
- WhatsApp. Does it support conversations with leads who prefer that channel?
Many agencies may find they have strong coverage in some of these areas and gaps in others.
Now here is why that gap matters more than it looks.
Speed is where the money actually leaks
One of the most frequently cited ideas in sales is the importance of responding quickly to inbound leads, but the underlying studies are often mixed together.
The widely cited five-minute findings come from earlier Lead Response Management research associated with Dr James Oldroyd and InsideSales.com, based on thousands of leads and call attempts.
A separate Harvard Business Review audit in 2011 looked at 2,241 US companies. Among companies that responded within 30 days, the average response time was 42 hours, while 23 percent of the companies never responded to the test lead at all.
Those figures are historical rather than a benchmark for businesses today, but the underlying lesson remains useful: response systems matter.
Now connect that to your channel gaps. If a lead calls, WhatsApps, or texts and there is nothing on the other end, there is no immediate response on that channel at all.
Then agencies “fix” it. And build the multichannel trap.
So let’s say you go and plug the holes. You bolt on a voice bot. Then an SMS bot. Then something for WhatsApp. Five channels, all live. Sorted, right?
Not necessarily. Because now you can have a different failure, and this one is harder to see. This is the difference between multichannel and omnichannel. Multichannel means you show up in several places. Omnichannel aims to connect those places so the experience and context can continue between them.
When systems are disconnected, those bots may not talk to each other.
The customer explains their situation on chat. Calls the next day and explains it again. WhatsApps that night and explains it a third time. Then gets an SMS asking a question they already answered twice.
That is not much of an AI presence. That is four strangers wearing the same t shirt, taking turns talking to the same person.
And customers can find this kind of disconnected experience frustrating.
McKinsey’s data makes the point clearly. More than half of B2B buyers surveyed said they were likely to switch suppliers if the experience across channels was not smooth. When researchers asked about specific problems, 51 percent said a lack of customer tracking across channels would be an impediment to doing business with a supplier.
Read that one again, because it is the whole argument of this article. Buyers are not just asking businesses to be present on more channels. They increasingly expect those channels to work together.
Two holes, not one
So the problem was never a single thing. It is two, stacked:
Hole one: your AI may not be present on every channel your leads actually use.
Hole two: the channels you do have may not share enough context.

Plug one and ignore the other, and you may simply build a more complicated customer experience. Five disconnected bots can create friction in five places instead of one.
A more connected approach is one brain across all of them. Chat, inbound calls, outbound calls, SMS and WhatsApp, all feeding the same memory. The goal is for customer context to carry across supported channels so people do not have to unnecessarily repeat information.
This is what the Knock Knock app (the AI sales layer, also known as NOX) was built to support. It sits alongside the CRM the agency already runs, such as GoHighLevel or HubSpot, connects supported communication channels, and brings relevant interaction data into a shared system that can scores each lead as Cold, Intermediate, Warm, Very Warm or Booked.
The part that changes the business, not just the experience
Everything above is about reducing friction. That matters. But there is a second benefit that agencies can easily miss.
When one system can observe signals across multiple channels, it can provide a broader picture of lead activity.
Right now, many agencies wait. They wait for someone to fill in a form, reply to an email, or pick up the phone. Meanwhile a contact might have opened recent emails, returned to the pricing page several times and kept circling back to one product without directly raising their hand.
When those signals are available and connected, a shared system can help surface changes in intent so the client’s team can decide who may be worth prioritizing.
That is the difference between relying only on explicit enquiries and also paying attention to available intent signals.
And it can stack neatly with what agencies already do well. Prospecting happens at the top. Nurturing continues through the GoHighLevel workflows you have already built. Then the sales layer can help engage people across supported channels and surface relevant lead information for the client’s team.
Why this is an opportunity, not a threat
If you are an agency owner reading this and feeling slightly caught out, do not. This is the good news part.
The tooling you have built is not wasted. Your workflows become the foundation. What you are adding is broader presence and shared context across the customer journey.
And there is evidence that multichannel campaigns can perform differently from single-channel campaigns. Analysis of more than 135,000 marketing campaigns, cited by Wharton, found that campaigns using three or more channels had a 494 percent higher order rate than single-channel campaigns.
That figure comes from a 2021 Omnisend analysis cited by Wharton, so it should not be treated as a guaranteed outcome for every business. But it illustrates why connected channel strategies are worth testing.
Which means an agency that can deliver connected omnichannel AI is offering more than a nicer chatbot. It is offering a broader customer-engagement capability that can help differentiate its service rather than competing only on a race to the bottom on setup fees.
GoHighLevel gave you the automation. This adds another layer of visibility and engagement.
That is the layer that can otherwise be missing.
Frequently asked questions
Not quite. Adding the same chatbot to more places would still be multichannel if those interactions remained disconnected. The goal of an omnichannel approach is to connect supported channels so relevant context can carry from one interaction to another.
No. The idea is not to replace the CRM or the workflows you have already built. Knock Knock can work alongside supported CRM systems such as GoHighLevel, adding engagement and visitor intelligence capabilities around the existing setup.
Good workflows are valuable, but workflows and customer engagement solve different parts of the problem. A workflow can automate what happens after a trigger. A connected engagement layer can help respond to and understand activity happening across supported customer touchpoints.
Run the five point test above. Look at website chat, inbound voice, outbound voice, SMS and WhatsApp. Then ask a second question: if the same person moves between those channels, does the next interaction have access to relevant context from the previous one? The answer can reveal both coverage and continuity gaps.
The level of technical work depends on your client’s existing CRM, website, communication channels, integrations and configuration. Agencies already working with automation platforms such as GoHighLevel may already understand many of the underlying workflow concepts, but setup requirements can vary.
Ready to get even more out of Knock Knock? Join our Facebook community to connect with other users, share ideas, and stay up to date with new features: Knock Knock Community
Anna Hyatt
Co-Founder | Knock Knock App
AI × Human Touch = Happier Clients, More Revenue
LinkedIn Profile


